Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Seven strategies employed by the tobacco industry to undermine the impact of tax increases
Wed, 2015-06-10 09:01 — editor
By Manjari Peiris
Seven strategies employed by the tobacco industry to undermine the impact of tax increases is revealed through a project carried out at the University of Cape Town and University of Illinois, at Chicago and later published from the Economics of Tobacco Control and Tobacco Economics, respectively.
These strategies have been used by the tobacco industry to avoid the impact of planned tobacco tax increases on their profits and outlines what governments can do to prepare effective responses.
This publication titled - Undermining Government Tax Policies: Common Strategies Employed by the Tobacco Industry in Response to Tobacco Tax Increases is designed to assist governments to monitor, anticipate and understand tobacco industry actions prior to tobacco tax increases.
Thus tobacco control partners are encouraged to use this document to strengthen their understanding of tobacco industry practices and to inform tax policymakers.
The seven strategies include of the following;
Stockpiling; changing product attributes or production processes, lowering prices, over-shifting prices, under-shifting prices, timing planned price increases to company advantages, and engaging in price discrimination and/or offering price promotions.
This document also describes country case studies on how the tobacco industry has employed these strategies.
Further, it provides guidance on measures that governments can take to counter tobacco industry actions to undermine tobacco tax increases and the type of data governments should collect in order to monitor tobacco industry actions in response to planned tobacco tax increases, in order to formulate effective response.
The Economics of Tobacco Control Project at the School of Economics, University of Cape Town works to expand current research in the economics of tobacco control and enhance the knowledge of economic and tax issues among tobacco control advocates and policymakers in sub-Saharan Africa.
Tobacconomics is a program based at the University of Illinois at Chicago comprising leading researchers focused on the economics of tobacco control policy. It makes available current and sound research about effective approaches to curbing tobacco use and their economic impact.


- Asian Tribune -

Friday, June 5, 2015

Today is World Environment Day (June 5th)

Today is World Environment Day (June 5th)


Fri, 2015-06-05 06:57 — editor


By Manjari Peiris

The international theme for this year is, “Seven Billion Dreams. One Planet, consume with care”. This theme highlights the fact that human needs, economic growth and the sustainable us of the environment are directly Food, air and water needed for the beings are obtained from the environment, while the world economy runs on resources derived from the environment. Therefore responsible management of the natural resources obtained from the earth is essential to sustain its ability to continue to provide for human well being and the economy.
Nevertheless there is evidence that people are consuming far more natural resources than the planet may provide. Many ecosystems are nearing depletion and irreversible change since humans are using resources at a high rate.
“If current consumption and production patterns remain the same with a rising population which is expected to reach 9.6 billion, by 2050, we will need three planets to sustain our ways of living and consumption.” States UN Secretary General, Ban ki-Moon.
The theme for this year calls on every consumer to take responsibility to relieve the earth from the demands of over consumption of natural resources. As individuals we need to be thoughtful that the planet is shared with 7 billion people. The earth can then meet the needs of its entire people at present, and in future too!
We need to act urgently to stop excessive consumption and wastage and to change to sustainable living. We have one earth to sustain the requirements of 7 billion consumers. Let us be mindful of our consumption and allow others as well to live.
Today is World Environment Day (June 5th). This day is dedicated by the United Nations to encourage people worldwide raise awareness and to take action to improve the environment
Recently the President of Sri Lanka, Maithripala Sirisena, stated that he would use his Executive Powers only to protect the environment which is a very ardent statement made towards the well-being of the people of the country.
Worldwide, smokers throw at least 4.5 trillion cigarette butts each year. A study published in the journal Tobacco Control from a US researchers’ study where they call for better enforcement of laws against littering to reduce the environmental impact of cigarette butts, additional taxes on tobacco products to go towards clean-up efforts, and more effort on the part of tobacco industry to reduce packaging waste and educate consumers about the impact of tobacco waste on the environment.
“The average cigarette butt contains numerous chemicals which may be considered health hazards,” states the co-authors Dr. Thomas Novotny of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia and Dr. Feng Zhao of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland.
The researchers note that “smokers may not consider that a cigarette butt is little, but these waste products seem to be ubi1uitous. “ Butts are often cast onto the sidewalk, where they often end up in drains and then out to lakes and seas. While the paper and tobacco of cigarette butts are biodegradable, their cellulose acetate filters are not.” the report mentions.
Discarded cigarette butts in ashtrays cab also pose a serious health risk to children, such as vomiting, gagging and lethargy.
- Asian Tribune -
Ukraine Puts Public Health First in Suspending WTO Challenge to Australia’s Law Requiring Plain Cigarette Packs


Thu, 2015-06-04 08:31 — editor

By Manjari Peiris

The Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, Washington DC., reports that Ukraine’s new government has suspended the country’s case before the World Trade Organization that challenged Australia’s law requiring that cigarettes be sold in plain packagingThis action is a blow to the continued efforts of the tobacco industry to challenge the world’s first plain packaging law by the Australian government, which was enacted in 2011.
Ukraine has delivered a clear message by suspending its case before the WTO, that the new government is making public health a priority over the interests of the big tobacco companies.
Ukraine has set an example that should be followed quickly by the other countries that have challenged Australia. This is another important sign to prove the lack of merit of the claims of the tobacco industry against Australia.
The former Ukrainian government initiated this action before the WTO with financial support obtained from the British American Tobacco, after the highest court of Australia rejected the lawsuits of the tobacco industry and upheld the plain packaging law in 2012.
Four other countries, viz. Honduras, Cuba, Indonesia and the Dominican Republic followed Ukraine’s lead and also challenged Australia’s law.
The decision of Ukraine to suspend its WTO challenge also aligns the trade policy on tobacco of the country with its strong domestic laws to reduce tobacco use, including a strong, nationwide smoke-free law, large graphic health warnings on cigarette packets, ban of tobacco advertising, promotions and sponsorships and higher tobacco taxes.
The Australian law requires that cigarettes be sold in plain, dull packaging, free of colour logos and other branding that encourages tobacco use. Earlier this year, Ireland and the United Kingdom became the second and third countries respectively, to require plan packaging, and other countries are considering such legislation.
Ukraine has struck a blow for the rights of all countries by suspending its WTO case against Australia, to enact strong measures that reduce tobacco consumption and protect the health of their citizens (Courtesy CTFK).
- Asian Tribune

Monday, June 1, 2015

Today (May 31st) is World No Tobacco Day. The theme for this year is “Stop Illicit Tobacco Trade”
Sun, 2015-05-31 07:45 — editor

By Manjari Peiris
The illicit trade in tobacco products is a threat both to government finances and to public health.
Illicit tobacco trade;
a)Deprives governments of much needed revenues;
b)Undermines efforts to reduce tobacco consumption, particularly through the imposition of high levels of tobacco taxation.
Although by definition the global illicit trade in tobacco products is hard to measure with accuracy, it is known to be very substantial. A 2009 study estimated that 11.6 percent of the global cigarette market was illicit. This is equivalent to 657 billion cigarettes a year, and means a loss of tax revenues of about US$40.5 billion.
What is Codentify?
Codentify is a coding system that the tobacco industry wants governments to adopt as a solution to their obligations to fight the illicit tobacco trade, under the WHO Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products (commonly known as the Illicit Trade Protocol, or ITP) and in the European Union under the revised EU Tobacco Products Directive.
Both the Protocol and Directive require a “tracking and tracing” system for tobacco products, which should help law enforcement agencies identify illicit products in their countries.
Codentify is a system based on alphanumeric codes, which are visibly printed on tobacco packaging. Each Codentify code is a unique, unpredictable set of 12 letters or numbers. According to tobacco indusrty, “Codentify avoids the requirement to store the codes by encrypting the information contained within them prior to printing through a patented combination of multiple keys and digital signatures”. The system is based on machine-generated codes created at factory level and printed on packaging. Factory level “secret keys” are stored on company (or third party) computer servers. Each key allows the production of a specified number of Codentify codes.
The codes may contain the following information:
• Date and time of manufacture
• Machine of manufacture
• Brand and brand variant
• Pack type, size, destination market and price.
Anyone who does not have access to secret keys to encrypt the information cannot generate original valid codes. Codes could be checked for validity through call centers, applications on mobile devices and through other means.
The tobacco industry has at least one global database. If a law enforcement officer enters a code through the DCTA portal, it can be checked for validity, and the decrypted code can be referred to the global database of the relevant firm to provide tracking and tracing information.
Possible Security Problems
The Codentify system uses relatively unsecured commercially available equipment on sites where operators may have a vested interest in misusing it. The system does not appear to prevent valid codes from being used twice. Therefore, counterfeiters and other illicit manufacturers could simply copy codes (sometimes called “code cloning”). Since Codentify codes are visible, it could be easy to collect a large number of such codes. If the same code is scanned twice on different packs it appears to be impossible to tell which is illicit.
Codentify also seems vulnerable to “code recycling”, to print valid codes on illicit products, for example by using codes originally printed on tobacco products that have been rejected and destroyed (which isn’t unusual during the production process). Particularly if these codes are placed on tobacco products sold in the same market as the legitimate products whose codes have been copied, it may be impossible for enforcement authorities to identify them as illicit.
The system of secret keys may be usable to generate apparently genuine tobacco products in factories “after hours”. For example, factories could use unused codes from a production run to produce additional products that are intended for illicit trade but may appear valid if the code is traced.
There may also be a weakness around “code migration”; where codes printed in one country can be reprinted in another, creating apparently legal products that enforcement agencies could not effectively trace.
Codes produced using inkjet printers may be easily erased or altered, and would therefore not be “securely affixed”, as required by the Protocol and Directive. Although the industry has marketed Codentify as a tax verification system, this does not appear to be the case for the reasons given above. This is why many countries where it is used also have a tax stamp system, for example in the European Union.
Other Issues
When enforcement agencies use Codentify codes in their investigations, the enquiries could be transparent to the industry, allowing it to manipulate replies and hide key data. The tobacco industry’s secretive behaviour means that there has been no full independent assessment of the security of the Codentify system. Without such an assessment, governments could be opting for a “black box” system, with features and possible weaknesses that only the tobacco industry is aware of.
Some information required under the Protocol and Directive will not be known at the time of production, when Codentify codes would be printed. This includes shipment routes from manufacturing to first retailer, the identity of all purchasers from manufacturing to first retail outlet, and the invoices, order numbers and payments of all purchasers from manufacturing to first retailers. It is not clear how this information will be associated with Codentify codes.
It is unacceptable that any government or international agency should adopt the Codentify system without having set proper standards for its tracking and tracing regime, and having assessed properly whether Codentify meets them. This is particularly dangerous in countries with very limited enforcement resources.
The following questions must therefore be asked and answered before any government considers Codentify as a solution to its obligations under the Illicit Trade Protocol and the EU Products Directive.
a. Can Codentify codes be copied or diverted for use on tobacco products that are not tax paid, in order for them to appear as not illicit when examined by enforcement officers?
b. Does Codentify provide an adequate guarantee that tobacco products are being sold in their stated target market and are tax paid?
If it does, why do many European countries using Codentify also require tax stamps on tobacco products?
c. Would the use of Codentify by enforcement agencies, and access to any related database, be transparent to the tobacco industry, making available information about investigations that should be kept confidential?
d. Is Codentify and the accompanying handling and storage of data by the tobacco industry compliant with Article 8.8 of the Protocol, which requires the establishment of an independent “global focal point” through which governments and enforcement agencies can access the information required under Article 5?
e. Will the industry undertake to make available to governments, the European Commission or their designated agents, information about the source code and algorithms behind Codentify, so that it can be independently assessed?
f. Do individual Codentify codes include a product description, as required under Article 8.4.1(g) of the Protocol and Article 15.2(e) of the Directive?
g. Does the information encoded under Codentify include all the information required in Article 15 of the Directive, including “the actual shipment route from manufacturing to the first retail outlet … the identity of all purchasers from manufacturing to the first retail outlet” … and the invoice, order number and payment records of all purchasers from manufacturing to the first retail outlet”?
It should be noted that some of this information might not be known at the time of manufacture. There are many competing tracking and tracing systems provided by companies unrelated to the tobacco industry that could be used on tobacco packaging, for example 2d bar codes.
These should certainly be preferred, if there are no satisfactory answers to the key questions about Codentify
(Courtesy: Framework Convention Alliance (FCA)
- Asian Tribune -


The Nation Sunday, May 31, 2015  Clipboard

Today is World No Tobacco Day

Two-thirds of all cancer deaths occur in low-and middle-income countries. Lung, breast, colorectal, stomach and liver cancers cause the majority of cancer deaths. In high-income countries, the leading causes of cancer deaths are lung cancer among men and breast cancer among women. Some countries have created components of the health infrastructure that is essential to containing the spread of NCDs, but have not effectively funded or implemented them.

Non-Communicable Diseases -  Leading global cause of death

By Manjari Peiris

The Global Status Report on non-communicable diseases 2010 developed by WHO is the first report on the worldwide epidemic of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases.

This report reviews the current status of non-communicable diseases and provides a road map for reversing the epidemic by strengthening national and global monitoring and surveillance, scaling up the implementation of evidence-based measures to reduce risk factors like tobacco use, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity and harmful alcohol use, and improving access to cost-effective healthcare interventions to prevent complications, disabilities and premature death.

Burden

Of a total of 57 million deaths occurred in the world during 2008, 36 million were due to NCDs, principally cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer and chronic respiratory diseases. Nearly 80 percent of these NCD related deaths (29 million) occurred in low -and middle-income countries. NCDs are the most frequent causes of death in most countries in the Americas, the Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South East Asia, and the Western Pacific in the African Region.

The leading causes of NCD deaths in 2008 were: Cardiovascular diseases (17 million deaths, or 48 percent of NCD deaths); cancers (7.6 million, or 21 percent of NCD deaths); and respiratory diseases, including asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), (4.2 million). Diabetes caused an additional 1.3 million deaths.

More than two thirds of all cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Lung, breast, colorectal, stomach and liver cancers cause the majority of cancer deaths.

In high-income countries, the leading causes of cancer deaths are lung cancer among men and breast cancer among women. In low- and middle-income countries cancer levels vary according to the prevailing underlying risks.

Most NCDs are strongly associated and causally linked with four behaviours: Tobacco use, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and the harmful use of alcohol.

Tobacco

Tobacco use and exposure comes in both smokeless and smoking forms. Smokeless tobacco is consumed in un-burnt forms through chewing or sniffing and contains several carcinogenic, or cancer-causing, compounds. Smokeless tobacco has been associated with oral cancer, hypertension, heart disease and other conditions. Smoking tobacco, by far the most commonly used form globally, contains over 4000 chemicals, of which 50 are known to be carcinogenic.

Risks to health from tobacco use result not only from direct consumption of tobacco, but also from exposure to secondhand smoke. Almost six million people die from tobacco use and exposure each year, accounting for six percent of all female and 12 percent of all male deaths in the world. Of these deaths, just over 600, 000 are attributable to second-hand smoke exposure among non-smokers, and more than five million to direct tobacco use (both smoking and smokeless)

Insufficient physical activity

Approximately 3.2 million deaths each year are attributable to insufficient physical activity. People who are insufficiently physically active have a 20–30 percent increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to those who engage in at least 30 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity on most days of the week. Participation in 150 minutes of moderate physical activity each week (or equivalent) is estimated to reduce the risk of ischemic heart disease by 30 percent, the risk of diabetes by 27 percent, and the risk of breast and colon cancer by 21–25 percent. Additionally, physical activity lowers the risk of stroke, hypertension and depression. It is a key determinant of energy expenditure and thus fundamental to energy balance and weight control.

Alcohol consumption

There is a direct relationship between higher levels of alcohol consumption and rising risk of some cancers, liver diseases and cardiovascular diseases. The relationship between alcohol consumption and ischemic heart and cerebrovascular diseases is complex. It depends on both the amount and the pattern of alcohol consumption.

Unhealthy diet

Adequate consumption of fruit and vegetables reduces the risk for cardiovascular diseases, stomach cancer and colorectal cancer. There is convincing evidence that the consumption of high levels of high-energy foods, such as processed foods that are high in fats and sugars, promotes obesity compared to low energy foods such as fruits and vegetables. The amount of dietary salt consumed is an important determinant of blood pressure levels and overall cardiovascular risk. A population salt intake of less than five grams per person per day is recommended by WHO for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, data from various countries indicate that most populations are consuming much more salt than this quantity. It is estimated that decreasing dietary salt intake from the current global levels of 9–12 grams per day – to the recommended level of 5 grams per day – would have a major impact on reducing blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. There is convincing evidence that saturated fat and trans-fat increase the risk of coronary heart disease and that replacement with monosaturated and polyunsaturated fat reduces the risk.

Blood pressure

Worldwide, raised blood pressure is estimated to cause 7.5 million deaths, about 12.8 percent of the total of all annual deaths. Raised blood pressure is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease and ischemic as well as hemorrhagic stroke). Blood pressure levels have been shown to be positively and progressively related to the risk for stroke and coronary heart disease. In addition to coronary heart diseases and stroke, complications of raised blood pressure include heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, renal impairment, retinal hemorrhage and visual impairment. Treating systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure so they are below 140/90 mmHg is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular complications.

Overweight and obesity

Overweight and obesity lead to adverse metabolic effects on blood pressure, cholesterol, triglycerides and insulin resistance. Risks of coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke and type 2 diabetes mellitus increase steadily with increasing Body Mass Index (BMI), a measure of weight relative to height. Raised BMI also increases the risk of cancer of the breast, colon/rectum, endometrial, kidney, esophagus (adenocarcinoma) and pancreas. Mortality rates increase with increasing degrees of overweight, as measured by BMI. The prevalence of raised BMI increases with income level of countries, up to upper middle-income levels. 

The prevalence of overweight in high-income and upper middle-income countries was more than double that of low- and lower-middle income countries.

Cholesterol Raised

Cholesterol levels increase the risks of heart disease and stroke. Globally, a third of ischemic heart disease is attributable to high cholesterol. Overall, raised cholesterol is estimated to cause 2.6 million deaths. Raised total cholesterol is a major cause of disease burden in both the developed and developing world as a risk factor for ischemic heart disease and stroke. In low-income countries around a quarter of adults had raised total cholesterol, in lower-middle income countries. 

This rose to around a third of the population for both sexes. In high income countries, over 50 percent of adults had raised total cholesterol; more than double the level of the low-income countries.

Cancer associated infections

A wide range of environmental causes of cancer, encompassing environmental contaminants or pollutants, occupationally related exposures and radiation, together make a significant contribution to cancer burden and are often modifiable at low cost. Notable examples of environmental causes of cancer are asbestos, benzene, indoor and outdoor air pollution and contaminants such as arsenic. Ionizing radiation increases the risk for several cancer types. Impact on development

The NCD epidemic exacts a massive socioeconomic toll throughout the world. It is rising rapidly in lower-income countries and among the poor in middle and high-income countries. Each year, NCDs are estimated to cause more than 9 million deaths before the age of 60 years with associated negative impacts on productivity and development. The increasing burden of NCDs also imposes severe economic consequences that range from poverty of families to high health system costs and the weakening of country economies.

Lack of monitoring

The WHO points out that current capacity for NCD surveillance are inadequate in many countries and urgently require strengthening. High quality NCD risk factor surveillance is possible even in low-resource countries and settings. A surveillance framework that monitors exposures (risk factors and determinants), outcomes (morbidity and mortality) and health-system responses (interventions and capacity) is essential. A common set of core indicators is needed for each component of the framework. Cancer morbidity data are essential for planning and monitoring cancer control initiatives. Population-based cancer registries play a central role in cancer control programs, because they provide the means to plan, monitor and evaluate the impact of specific interventions in targeted populations.

Interventions

The majority of NCD can be averted through interventions and policies that reduce major risk factors. Many preventive measures are cost-effective, including for low-income countries. Some preventive actions can have a quick impact on the burden of disease at the population level. Interventions that combine a range of evidence-based approaches have better results. Comprehensive prevention strategies must emphasize the need for sustained interventions over time.

WHO states

That there is robust evidence that tobacco control is cost-effective compared to other health interventions.

Promoting physical activity and healthy diet through the media is a cost effective and highly feasible intervention.

Cost-effective measures for reducing harmful alcohol use include increasing alcoholic beverage taxes, regulating the availability of alcoholic beverages, restricting marketing of alcoholic beverages and drink-driving countermeasures.

The majority of non-communicable diseases can be averted through interventions and policies that reduce major risk factors.

Currently, many low- and middle income countries have health systems that do 
not meet the requirements for chronic care.

Cardiovascular mortality rates have declined substantially in high-income countries. The decline is due to both prevention and treatment interventions.

Access to care, oral morphine and staff trained in palliative care is limited in many low- and middle-income countries, so that most cancer patients die without adequate pain relief.

When cost-effective healthcare interventions are complemented with population-wide prevention strategies, a significant impact can be made on the global NCD epidemic.

To improve efficiency, health-system policies should prioritize interventions that are essential for preventing the progression of NCDs. Limited resources and weak health systems in low- and middle-income countries, demand prioritization of a package of essential NCD interventions, including best buys (high impact, very cost-effective, affordable and feasible interventions). Financing and strengthening health systems to deliver the best buys through a primary heal and 12 percent of all male deaths in the world. Of these deaths, just over 600, 000 are attributable to second-hand smoke exposure among non-smokers, and more than five million to direct tobacco use (both smoking and smokeless)

Impact on development

The NCD epidemic exacts a massive socioeconomic toll throughout the world. It is rising rapidly in lower-income countries and among the poor in middle and high-income countries. Each year, NCDs are estimated to cause more than 9 million deaths before the age of 60 years with associated negative impacts on productivity and development. The increasing burden of NCDs also imposes severe economic consequences that range from poverty of families to high health system costs and the weakening of country economies.

Lack of monitoring

The WHO points out that current capacity for NCD surveillance are inadequate in many countries and urgently require strengthening. High quality NCD risk factor surveillance is possible even in low-resource countries and settings. A surveillance framework that monitors exposures (risk factors and determinants), outcomes (morbidity and mortality) and health-system responses (interventions and capacity) is essential. A common set of core indicators is needed for each component of the framework.

Cancer morbidity data are essential for planning and monitoring cancer control initiatives. Population-based cancer registries play a central role in cancer control programs, because they provide the means to plan, monitor and evaluate the impact of specific interventions in targeted populations. Interventions The majority of NCD can be averted through interventions and policies that reduce major risk factors. Many preventive measures are cost-effective, including for low-income countries. Some preventive actions can have a quick impact on the burden of disease at the population level.

Interventions that combine a range of evidence-based approaches have better results. Comprehensive prevention strategies must emphasize the need for sustained interventions over time.

WHO states That there is robust evidence that tobacco control is cost-effective compared to other health interventions. Promoting physical activity and healthy diet through the media is a cost effective and highly feasible intervention. Cost-effective measures for reducing harmful alcohol use include increasing alcoholic beverage taxes, regulating the availability of alcoholic beverages, restricting marketing of alcoholic beverages and drink-driving countermeasures. The majority of non-communicable diseases can be averted through interventions and policies that reduce major risk factors.

Currently, many low- and middle income countries have health systems that do not meet the requirements for chronic care. Cardiovascular mortality rates have declined substantially in high-income countries. The decline is due to both prevention and treatment interventions. Access to care, oral morphine and staff trained in palliative care is limited in many low- and middle-income countries, so that most cancer patients die without adequate pain relief. When cost-effective healthcare interventions are complemented with population-wide prevention strategies, a significant impact can be made on the global NCD epidemic.

To improve efficiency, health-system policies should prioritize interventions that are essential for preventing the progression of NCDs. Limited resources and weak health systems in low- and middle-income countries, demand prioritization of a package of essential NCD interventions, including best buys (high impact, very cost-effective, affordable and feasible interventions).

Financing and strengthening health systems to deliver the best buys through a primary healthcare approach is a realistic first step to achieve the long-term vision of universal coverage.

According to WHO, in the past decade, countries have expanded their capacities to respond to the epidemic of non-communicable diseases. Real progress, though uneven, has been made. Many countries have developed NCD strategies, plans and guidelines, although a substantial proportion of them are not yet operational. 

Some countries have created components of the health infrastructure that is essential to containing the spread of NCDs, but have not effectively funded or implemented them. However, the existence of initiatives to combat the NCD epidemic in a growing number of countries provides a strong foundation to extend progress in the coming years through increasingly robust efforts. High-income countries were nearly four times more likely to have NCD services and treatments covered by health insurance than low-income countries. The availability of NCD treatments in low-income countries is one quarter that of high-income countries. 

Even in hospital settings in low income countries, there is limited availability of basic technologies required for NCD care.

WHO states that Country capacity for the prevention and control of NCDs have seen significant improvements in the past decade. Growing country capacity for combating the NCD epidemic indicates that there is a significant opportunity for progress over the coming years. Current evidence unequivocally demonstrates that NCDs are largely preventable. Countries can reverse the advance of these diseases and achieve quick gains, if appropriate action is taken.

The WHO points out that reversing the epidemic of NCDs is not only a key responsibility of all governments. It also requires engagement from civil society and the business sector. Civil society institutions are uniquely placed to mobilize political awareness and support for NCD prevention and control. They play a key role in advocating for NCDs to be a part of the global development agenda.

Civil society institutions and nongovernmental organizations contribute to capacity building. They are also significant providers of prevention and treatment services for cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and respiratory diseases, often filling gaps between services provided by the private and government sectors.

At a global level, nongovernmental organizations have grouped together to collectively support and influence global tobacco control efforts and, more recently, wider NCD prevention control, providing a strong platform for advocacy and action.

The role and capacity of civil society should be supported and strengthened at the national and international levels. Companies should also adopt and strengthen programs to improve the health and well-being of their employees through workplace health promotion and specific NCD prevention schemes. Virtually all industries can help to reduce pollution and promote healthy lifestyles.